Cricket
Movies
News
Business
Tech
IndiaShining
Masti
LetsDiscuss
Miscellaneous
Sports
Travel
Results
Health
All
LetsDiscuss: ‘Valmiki said Ram was a drunkard’ : Karunanidhi.
What the hell is this Man upto???
11 comments | category: LetsDiscuss | Add this link to... | tell a friend | bakwaas
comments
Don't you guys think, We "Hindus" r bit sceptical about our religion. we are hypocrites...we celebrate all the festivals with gr8 enthusiasm. V believes in our Gods. But now questions has been raised on our gods,questions on there existence has been raised.Today they are questioning the existence of Ram,2row they wll question abt Ganesh,Shiv,Krishana.....If this thing had been happend wth other religion's like Muslims they wud hd set world on fire. n v all witnessd it wen it happend in Denmark....Cnt v do ne thng to stop these nonsense things stated by an Honorable chief minister. Or v wll just sit on our comfortable couches n discuss it on rambhai.
So what you want sir?
Cool down...
Another 2002 riots? or one more set of Ayodhya 1990?
Believe me, its one of the greatest achievments of India to co-exist peacefully despite coming from so many colors, races , castes , religions etc.
My brother please don't encourage our fellow citizens to start a riot..
On the other hand, I do not agree with whatever Karunanidhi said because being on the seat of a CM one should be cautious enough to what to say or what not to say.
One has all the rights for being theists or atheiest as long as he doesn't 'impose' his view on others.
one cannot dismiss Sri Ram as a mythological character just because a lot of miracles were reported in his life and there are no scientific evidences to prove them. There were unproven miracles in the lives of the religious figures of every faith. Just because we can't prove the parting of the Red Sea, we can't say that Moses was a fictitious figure. Just because there were miracles in the lives of Jesus, Moses and Mohammed, you cannot call them mythical figures.
The authenticity of Ram's reality cannot be doubted, there are numerous places in India & Sri Lnka closely linked to him viz Ayodhya, Janakpuri, Dhanushkodi and Rameswaram.
The whole debate about whether or not Lord Ram existed or not is redundant. Even if he did not exist, this is not going to diminish his importance because he actually exists in the hearts of the people. A denial can drive people into a frenzy.
Lastly, wd like to add,logic and science have their say but not in matters of faith.
I agree with galnextdoor, and also suggest that this is just a political debate intended to frenzy mobs and garner vote banks. Matters of faith are personal to each human being, and that should not be dragged into debates. I feel rather than debating stupid things like whether Ram was a drunkard or not, we should be debating the merits of sethusamudram project and whether there is a way that both the bridge and new structure proposed can co exist.
j2iu n garfield, read this further on
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/LEADER_ARTICLE_Dont_Mix_Myth_And_History/articleshow/2387967.cms
Ram is not a myth tht is for sure.
Read on the comment which has been posted on tht story...
If we say Ram is a myth then everything else like, the Dashavatar, the Vedas and the Puranas become a lie.The entire Indian heritage and culture will flounder. And If Ram is a myth why did the Ayodhya issue crop up and create chaos?
Nice comment...
This is also true tht these political parties r tryng to mend truth in there own ways.They wnt to cash it on Ram's name.
PS: Moderators, for heaven sake please do some active MODERATION!
So what you want sir?
Cool down...
Another 2002 riots? or one more set of Ayodhya 1990?
Believe me, its one of the greatest achievments of India to co-exist peacefully despite coming from so many colors, races , castes , religions etc.
My brother please don't encourage our fellow citizens to start a riot..
On the other hand, I do not agree with whatever Karunanidhi said because being on the seat of a CM one should be cautious enough to what to say or what not to say.
One has all the rights for being theists or atheiest as long as he doesn't 'impose' his view on others.
So what you want sir?
Cool down...
Another 2002 riots? or one more set of Ayodhya 1990?
Believe me, its one of the greatest achievments of India to co-exist peacefully despite coming from so many colors, races , castes , religions etc.
My brother please don't encourage our fellow citizens to start a riot..
On the other hand, I do not agree with whatever Karunanidhi said because being on the seat of a CM one should be cautious enough to what to say or what not to say.
One has all the rights for being theists or atheiest as long as he doesn't 'impose' his view on others.
I think everybody agrees that there is no point jumping on this debate and making it a national issue, however we do implore the politicians to make sensible statements. India has been riot free for past few years and lets keep it that way. I think j3imu agrees to it to.
Sorry guys I couldnt access the link but reading through all your comments and knowing what's happening, I would say I agree with wd2ma that there is no need to unncessarily boil blood and propagate strong comments. Many things about religion are unexplained yet we believe in them because its our choice, we want to do that so we do it.Finding reason and logic after everything is not required .Lord Ram exists in our hearts, we dont need any political speeches or Rarthyatras to prove his existence.
Having said that as a Hindu and and a strong believer in all Hindu deities and gods, i think if we require some changes made to sethusamudram so as to improve a bottleneck or improvise, why not do it...
Would like to ask all those who are making great hue and cry about the issue that did they know such a sructure existed before media and politicians blew it up...?And what difference would it make to their lives if it was touched also...
Friends, lets try to grow above all this!
Well jagruti, I for one knew about the structure, however I was not aware of such an issue going on. I would also like to add it would be a good idea if the project does not touch the natural structure. If it hurts the original formation in some way, there is bound to be a hue and cry. There might be riots again. Hence for the project's success it would be best if it leaves sethusamudram natural formation alone. I dont think that should be too hard.
Well im so sry if i hurted someones sentiments. but it wasn't intended to offend someone or to start riots as my respected friends thinks. This was just to throw some light on the political scenario of India. It was to show that how low can an Honorable Chief Minister Can go. Well m sry once again but m nt against ne one.