rambhai.com - MUMBAI 11/26: WILL INDIA USE THE MILITARY OPTION?

29
vote here

LetsDiscuss: MUMBAI 11/26: WILL INDIA USE THE MILITARY OPTION?

Click Here for Original Story: http://vinodksharma.blogspot.com
posted by billupa 1248 days ago

The saber-rattling that started after the terror attack on Mumbai on November 26 is now getting predictable and hollow. The more India shouts, the more uncompromising and bolder Pakistan gets. Why? By now it knows that India just does not have the balls to back its effete bark.
9 comments | tags: mumbai 11/26 terror let pakistan. attack all | category: LetsDiscuss | Content type: Video Clip | Add this link to... | tell a friend | bakwaas

comments

| written by denny 1248 days ago Rating: 1 | Rate comment: + -

hey bill as per the latest info the Pak army is also involved in the blasts........ i think i should die out of shame or kill these fucking politicians if they are not gonna kill all the terrorists caught and surviving in the various jails of India........

i dont give a damn fuck abt the human rights of these popel if Pakistani army doesn't cares about our human rights......

| written by billupa 1248 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

You and I are going to die in any case, the way our leaders have gone about and are going about avoiding fighting this proxy war...no one seems to have learnt anything from history.

| written by denny 1246 days ago Rating: 1 | Rate comment: + -

hey guys what all of u feel......... even i was initially against war as it kills thousands of people and lot of money is wasted.......

hey i feel that Pakistan should know that if India starts the war US and Israel are gonna help India and with the technological security that Israel possess i am sure Pak is gonna be destroyed......

instead of this the stupid leaders over there are claiming that Pak will retaliate if anything happens and we over here are saying no one wants war.......

if the military is accused and involved in the blasts then a war is required i suppose..........
| written by cricketgod 1247 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

Edited & Removed.

| written by nameless_wanderer 1247 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

Movement of troops doesn't necessarily mean war, it is a normal phenomenon whenever there is increase in cross-border tension. At this stage, it is actually credible deterrent for war to both sides.
| written by garfield79 1247 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

nameless, without movement of troops we can not have war, so i would say it increases likelihood of war even though it does not mean there would be war. And yes you are right it could actually serve as a deterrent to war, because both sides know that the other is prepared. Anyways.. only time can tell.

| written by garfield79 1247 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

hey guys just a suggestion, this is an open board. Lets not discuss actual location of troop movements etc.

| written by cricketgod 1247 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

THanks, I removed that but It was what mention in the internet media rather my own eye sight.

| written by billupa 1247 days ago Rating: 0 | Rate comment: + -

There will be no war. Not yet. Such things are no thought of first time after yo are hit. They have to be carefully planned in anticipation of such a hit. That has clearly not been done. Every one is just passing time...